<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truth &amp; Consequences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/</link>
	<description>a physician looks at medicine, religion, politics, pets, &#38; passion in life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Faith of &#8216;Progressivism&#8217; &#8211; Bruce Hanify</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-15387</link>
		<dc:creator>The Faith of &#8216;Progressivism&#8217; &#8211; Bruce Hanify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 06:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/#comment-15387</guid>
		<description>[...] Man Can­not Exist With­out Tran­scen­dent Absolutes, even Though he Denies Their Exis­tence. It did not mat­ter, or it some­how escaped their oth­er­wise sharp­ened intel­lects, that all men and all worlds dwell within a mir­a­cle and a mys­tery so deep and so far beyond the under­stand­ing of the human mind that we sim­ply lack the senses to per­ceive it — except through the ancient embed­ded sense of faith alone. Indeed, rely­ing on the fact that “faith” is not obvi­ously tied to any sin­gle sense organ, they would deny that it is a sense at all. And the more you deny the sense of faith in your­self, the weaker and more ves­ti­gial it becomes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Man Can­not Exist With­out Tran­scen­dent Absolutes, even Though he Denies Their Exis­tence. It did not mat­ter, or it some­how escaped their oth­er­wise sharp­ened intel­lects, that all men and all worlds dwell within a mir­a­cle and a mys­tery so deep and so far beyond the under­stand­ing of the human mind that we sim­ply lack the senses to per­ceive it — except through the ancient embed­ded sense of faith alone. Indeed, rely­ing on the fact that “faith” is not obvi­ously tied to any sin­gle sense organ, they would deny that it is a sense at all. And the more you deny the sense of faith in your­self, the weaker and more ves­ti­gial it becomes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-12346</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/#comment-12346</guid>
		<description>I have nothing to add, except, &quot;well said.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing to add, except, &#8220;well said.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honest 2 God &#187; Linky Love Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-12345</link>
		<dc:creator>Honest 2 God &#187; Linky Love Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/#comment-12345</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#8217;re looking for something meaty to chew on, then you&#8217;ll want to head over to this post at The Doctor Is In blog. It&#8217;s not an easy read, but it is well worth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#8217;re looking for something meaty to chew on, then you&#8217;ll want to head over to this post at The Doctor Is In blog. It&#8217;s not an easy read, but it is well worth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Drew Williams</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-12344</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Drew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/#comment-12344</guid>
		<description>Once again I thank you for causing my mind to engage. As I progress through my daily schedule, i find it difficult to get beyond the mundane. You, Sir, never seem to fail at prodding my grey matter to contemplate weightier subjects, and your talent to do so is truly a blessing. I pray that God has a long life planned for you to enable you to open the minds of a multitude of others and continue to let the light shine upon the path we all trod along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again I thank you for causing my mind to engage. As I progress through my daily schedule, i find it difficult to get beyond the mundane. You, Sir, never seem to fail at prodding my grey matter to contemplate weightier subjects, and your talent to do so is truly a blessing. I pray that God has a long life planned for you to enable you to open the minds of a multitude of others and continue to let the light shine upon the path we all trod along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retriever</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-12338</link>
		<dc:creator>retriever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2009/04/23/truth-consequences/#comment-12338</guid>
		<description>Worth the wait!  Good stuff! I especially like the section on &quot;to deny absolutes is to deny the freedom of the will&quot; which reminds me of some arguments in Jonathan Edwards on how the freedom of the will consists in conforming our passions and will to the will of God. (But can&#039;t give an exact reference as I have only a Blackberry in a camp here w no internet and can&#039;t find the book amongst some 8000 shifted around during winter fixup work).  

Also particularly liked your picture of how evolutionary biology is often described in language that implies intention and design rather than randomness.  I took a course of E.O.Wilson&#039;s in college that had a huge impact on me, and still admire him, and it grieves me that people set evolutionary biology and the faith at odds.  We live in a fallen world, and only see thru a glass darkly as yet but evolutionary biology (however imperfect) has shed much light.  There was a remark attributed to Jonathan Edwards about how we contribute to the glory of God ehich intrigues me.  God is truth.  God is light and in Him there is no darkness at all.  Yet our theories and ideas and struggles to see the patterns in His universe do, I believe, please Him and ornament it.  Much as our own kids&#039; kindergarten art adorns our fridges and offices and makes us smile in affection.  It&#039;s not Art, any more than our debate is Truth.  But still of value to the One who created us with the will to understand and adorn and heal and create in this world.

You explain weighty concepts far more clearly than my own over-personal blather.  I was discussing with a friend this week just these things your post addresses.  Bewailed how stupid I felt lately at not being able to out argue my college aged kids who are going thru the sceptical or agnostic phase.  He consoled me w a quote a friend had just sent him about how what matters is not to think too hard about our faith, but just to keep our focus on Christ.  Or words to that effect.   

This is, after all, patterning ourself after X.  Who was being asked to enter into philosophical debate on Truth but who resolutely kept His eyes on His Father, conforming His Will to that of the One who sent him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth the wait!  Good stuff! I especially like the section on &#8220;to deny absolutes is to deny the freedom of the will&#8221; which reminds me of some arguments in Jonathan Edwards on how the freedom of the will consists in conforming our passions and will to the will of God. (But can&#8217;t give an exact reference as I have only a Blackberry in a camp here w no internet and can&#8217;t find the book amongst some 8000 shifted around during winter fixup work).  </p>
<p>Also particularly liked your picture of how evolutionary biology is often described in language that implies intention and design rather than randomness.  I took a course of E.O.Wilson&#8217;s in college that had a huge impact on me, and still admire him, and it grieves me that people set evolutionary biology and the faith at odds.  We live in a fallen world, and only see thru a glass darkly as yet but evolutionary biology (however imperfect) has shed much light.  There was a remark attributed to Jonathan Edwards about how we contribute to the glory of God ehich intrigues me.  God is truth.  God is light and in Him there is no darkness at all.  Yet our theories and ideas and struggles to see the patterns in His universe do, I believe, please Him and ornament it.  Much as our own kids&#8217; kindergarten art adorns our fridges and offices and makes us smile in affection.  It&#8217;s not Art, any more than our debate is Truth.  But still of value to the One who created us with the will to understand and adorn and heal and create in this world.</p>
<p>You explain weighty concepts far more clearly than my own over-personal blather.  I was discussing with a friend this week just these things your post addresses.  Bewailed how stupid I felt lately at not being able to out argue my college aged kids who are going thru the sceptical or agnostic phase.  He consoled me w a quote a friend had just sent him about how what matters is not to think too hard about our faith, but just to keep our focus on Christ.  Or words to that effect.   </p>
<p>This is, after all, patterning ourself after X.  Who was being asked to enter into philosophical debate on Truth but who resolutely kept His eyes on His Father, conforming His Will to that of the One who sent him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

