<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Wrong is Wright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/</link>
	<description>a physician looks at medicine, religion, politics, pets, &#38; passion in life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Slavery of Deceit &#124; The Doctor Is In</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11512</link>
		<dc:creator>The Slavery of Deceit &#124; The Doctor Is In</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/#comment-11512</guid>
		<description>[...] thrust them both into the headlines and into the headlights of an oncoming freight train. I have written previously about Jeremiah Wright, and so have little to add to the millions of words already written on his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thrust them both into the headlines and into the headlights of an oncoming freight train. I have written previously about Jeremiah Wright, and so have little to add to the millions of words already written on his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Jennings</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11288</link>
		<dc:creator>William Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/#comment-11288</guid>
		<description>Profoundly insightful - a most valuable and excellent piece of writing!  Words DO mean things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Profoundly insightful &#8211; a most valuable and excellent piece of writing!  Words DO mean things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Bob</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/#comment-11278</guid>
		<description>I am reading a surprisingly-engaging and well-written book called the &lt;em&gt;History of Christianity&lt;/em&gt; by Paul Johnson. The path to orthodoxy in the first few centuries was not anything like many imagine. It was not a professional soccer match, highly coordinated, but far more like the swarm-ball played by 5th-graders, with a host of doctrinal variations, aberrations, and yes, heresies, which took 3-4 centuries to cull -- and which then, like gophers in &lt;em&gt;Caddie Shack&lt;/em&gt;, kept popping up again repeatedly over the centuries.

And certainly such aberrations of teaching and doctrine are not by any means limited to the Left -- although I think the number of conservative Christians who believe in legislating morality or establishing a Christian theocracy is far, far less than the media and public perception would indicate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reading a surprisingly-engaging and well-written book called the <em>History of Christianity</em> by Paul Johnson. The path to orthodoxy in the first few centuries was not anything like many imagine. It was not a professional soccer match, highly coordinated, but far more like the swarm-ball played by 5th-graders, with a host of doctrinal variations, aberrations, and yes, heresies, which took 3-4 centuries to cull &#8212; and which then, like gophers in <em>Caddie Shack</em>, kept popping up again repeatedly over the centuries.</p>
<p>And certainly such aberrations of teaching and doctrine are not by any means limited to the Left &#8212; although I think the number of conservative Christians who believe in legislating morality or establishing a Christian theocracy is far, far less than the media and public perception would indicate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11277</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/#comment-11277</guid>
		<description>The heresy you describe is not very original. Some of Jesus&#039;s followers believed that He was going to lead a Maccabean-style revolt against Roman rule. Big mistake.

There is a paradox in all this. The Kingdom is partly IN this world, but not OF this world. We are to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and visit the imprisoned, but the notion that the lion will lay down with the lamb because of our efforts will turn us into cat food.

This heresy is not just of the Left. The social conservative notion that we can legislate our way to righteousness, whether it&#039;s prohibition, abstinence education, etc., etc. is equally mistaken when drawn out of proportion. 

When it comes to sinners, I am the chief, not Eliot Spitzer, Britney Spears, or Jeremiah Wright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The heresy you describe is not very original. Some of Jesus&#8217;s followers believed that He was going to lead a Maccabean-style revolt against Roman rule. Big mistake.</p>
<p>There is a paradox in all this. The Kingdom is partly IN this world, but not OF this world. We are to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and visit the imprisoned, but the notion that the lion will lay down with the lamb because of our efforts will turn us into cat food.</p>
<p>This heresy is not just of the Left. The social conservative notion that we can legislate our way to righteousness, whether it&#8217;s prohibition, abstinence education, etc., etc. is equally mistaken when drawn out of proportion. </p>
<p>When it comes to sinners, I am the chief, not Eliot Spitzer, Britney Spears, or Jeremiah Wright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hootsbuddy</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11276</link>
		<dc:creator>Hootsbuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2008/03/15/wrong-is-wright-2/#comment-11276</guid>
		<description>Uh, no, I&#039;M not an atheist. I just picked what he said because I liked the reference to &quot;grace.&quot; 

No, not that kind of grace, the kind that Jackie Robinson had. 
I strongly denounce atheism in all it&#039;s forms and have lived my life by....

Oh, forget it. 
I hope you know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, no, I&#8217;M not an atheist. I just picked what he said because I liked the reference to &#8220;grace.&#8221; </p>
<p>No, not that kind of grace, the kind that Jackie Robinson had.<br />
I strongly denounce atheism in all it&#8217;s forms and have lived my life by&#8230;.</p>
<p>Oh, forget it.<br />
I hope you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

