<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Two Towers XIV: Heavy Lifting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/</link>
	<description>a physician looks at medicine, religion, politics, pets, &#38; passion in life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karrde</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/comment-page-1/#comment-3888</link>
		<dc:creator>karrde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/archives/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/#comment-3888</guid>
		<description>Say, I was told that cables hanging freely in the way you described would follow a curve called a &quot;hyperbolic cosine&quot;. (At least, called that by mathematicians.)

However, the description I was given matches the description of a catenary.

If you know what the natural number &lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt; is, you get the hyperbolic cosine by calculating the following:

(1/2)(&lt;i&gt;ex+e-x&lt;/i&gt;)

Of course, I think the hyperbolic cosine is cool...it&#039;s got an elegance to it that not many math functions have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say, I was told that cables hanging freely in the way you described would follow a curve called a &#8220;hyperbolic cosine&#8221;. (At least, called that by mathematicians.)</p>
<p>However, the description I was given matches the description of a catenary.</p>
<p>If you know what the natural number <i>e</i> is, you get the hyperbolic cosine by calculating the following:</p>
<p>(1/2)(<i>ex+e-x</i>)</p>
<p>Of course, I think the hyperbolic cosine is cool&#8230;it&#8217;s got an elegance to it that not many math functions have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Pike</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/archives/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Fascinating story.  And your pictures are marvelous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating story.  And your pictures are marvelous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie's Farm</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/comment-page-1/#comment-3883</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie's Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/archives/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/#comment-3883</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Monday Evening Links: Employees Only...&lt;/strong&gt;

(h/t, No Pasaran, and Cox and Forkum)Terror fund-raising in Boston. Solomonia.Hey, Carl. We love your books, but what is this baloney? BabaluA quote fromÂ a predictably intelligent Oxblog piece:A bit ham-handed perhaps, but one might even have argued t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Monday Evening Links: Employees Only&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>(h/t, No Pasaran, and Cox and Forkum)Terror fund-raising in Boston. Solomonia.Hey, Carl. We love your books, but what is this baloney? BabaluA quote fromÂ a predictably intelligent Oxblog piece:A bit ham-handed perhaps, but one might even have argued t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Bob</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/comment-page-1/#comment-3882</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/archives/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/#comment-3882</guid>
		<description>See, I just &lt;em&gt;knew &lt;/em&gt;my readers could figure this stuff out in their heads... thanks for the clarification, Durb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I just <em>knew </em>my readers could figure this stuff out in their heads&#8230; thanks for the clarification, Durb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Durbin</title>
		<link>http://docisinblog.com/index.php/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/comment-page-1/#comment-3881</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Durbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://docisinblog.com/archives/2006/09/17/two-towers-part-14/#comment-3881</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, the shape of cables before the decking is lifted into place is a bit sharper than that of a parabola. That is because the weight of the cabling changes how the whole length hangs, and that form is called &lt;a href=&quot;http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Catenary.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a catenary&lt;/a&gt;. (Once all of the decking is in place, the cables will once again form something close to a catenary, but it will probably be slightly different due to some of the decking weight being taken by the towers.)

The reason I mention this is because an inverted catenary (aka catenary arch) is the strongest arch you can build, literally. The pressure is equally distributed along all points. When I took ceramics, our teacher showed us pictures of a kiln they had built that was a catenary kiln; they&#039;d laid the bricks over the form and removed the form, then had someone sit on it to demonstrate its strengthâ€” before they&#039;d put any kind of mortar in it. In other words, loose bricks. Very cool.

*cough*

I just think that catenaries are cool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, the shape of cables before the decking is lifted into place is a bit sharper than that of a parabola. That is because the weight of the cabling changes how the whole length hangs, and that form is called <a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Catenary.html" rel="nofollow">a catenary</a>. (Once all of the decking is in place, the cables will once again form something close to a catenary, but it will probably be slightly different due to some of the decking weight being taken by the towers.)</p>
<p>The reason I mention this is because an inverted catenary (aka catenary arch) is the strongest arch you can build, literally. The pressure is equally distributed along all points. When I took ceramics, our teacher showed us pictures of a kiln they had built that was a catenary kiln; they&#8217;d laid the bricks over the form and removed the form, then had someone sit on it to demonstrate its strengthâ€” before they&#8217;d put any kind of mortar in it. In other words, loose bricks. Very cool.</p>
<p>*cough*</p>
<p>I just think that catenaries are cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

